I have a confession to make. Despite my many layers of geekiness, I never got into comic books or their cousin, the graphic novel. For the written word, I have always been more of an epic fantasy consumer or an RPG-supplement-that-I-will-never-use reader. Thus when I went to see The Watchmen at the local megaplex tonight, I did not have a preconception of what the movie ought to be. I have seen comic book adaptations that I loved (i.e. X-men and Spiderman) and ones that I did not (The Hulk (2003) and do not even get me started on Fantastic 4). Ultimately I want works based on speculative fiction to do well so that more spec. fic. works will be produced, but I readily acknowledge the difficult task for Hollywood types to produce projects that appeal to the zealot fans that science fiction produces and that also appeals to a wide enough audience to make the projects profitable.
***Spoiler Warning*** Some details below.

So, as a fan of geeky in general without being a fanboy of the Watchmen universe, I can say that I enjoyed Watchmen very much. It was dark, depressing, pessimistic, gritty, and gratuitous. And those are the good parts! Again, without knowing the source material, I found some parts distracting. The crystal clockwork on the planet Mars was visually stunning and completely superfluous. I get it, Dr. Manhattan is not like the rest of us. Celestial Harmony and all that, but it felt like some extra cash was left in the special effects budget and it had to be spent. And what's with the horned tiger beast that suddenly starts following Ozymandias around towards the end of the movie? Where did she come from?
What drew me into the movie and the Watchmen universe, however, was the alternative history that is created as the background to justify the pending nuclear holocaust that is the dramatic force behind the plot of the movie. The film uses flashbacks and narration to weave the main story (set in 1985) with a host of background information about both the characters and the world in which they live - from the characters' predecessors in the '40s to radical political issues in the '60s and '70s (such as the answer as to who shot JFK, how America won in Vietnam, and a world in which Nixon retains the presidency into the '80s). This distopian alternative history allowed the screenwriters to plant (or steal) a number of subtle humorous lines into a very dark and violent story. When the final confrontation between the heroes and the villain occurs, the viewer understands where the parties are coming from and how they reached the decisions that lead to the final confrontation.
In the end, the movie made me want to reach out to the
source material. Unfortunately, at 2 hours and 43 minutes, the movie let out after the local book stores were closed so I will have to wait to see if I enjoy the graphic novel as much as the movie. The book is always better, right?
Watchmen (the movie)? 3.5 M's out of 5.