Thursday, August 27, 2009

Podcast Roll


My love of storytelling in all its forms often leads to quite an entertainment deficit as I try to fit in movies, television shows, books, and other forms of story telling into a life that is increasingly over scheduled with pedantic necessities like paying bills and actually working. Luckily, the convenient Podcast keeps me connected to interesting fiction, non-fiction, and news and the evening commute gives me time to listen in.


My Top 10 in not-necessarily-preference order:

What are your favorite podcasts?

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Star Trek


Maybe I waited too long to see it and had my expectations set too high by other people's positive reviews or maybe I am just an old crumugeny Star Trek fan that is never satisfied.  After seeing the new Star Trek movie last night, my first reaction was a resounding "Meh."  As an action movie, it was pretty darn good.  I enjoyed the acting and the casting, even if every time I saw new-Spock, I thought of Heroes.  The special effects were pretty darn good, though at a couple of times I thought they were a bit overblown.   I certainly enjoyed the internal references to the Star Trek universe like "Admiral Archer's Beagle" and Pike ending the movie in a wheelchair (and the countless others I missed or forgot).

 

I guess I have three major spolierific problems with the movie that really left an ashen taste in my mouth:

 

1)         Red Matter.  Hey, this is the Star Trek universe and we need a plot device, so let's create a particle or substance out of thin air to drive the story.  Throw us a bone, and at least have old-Spock throw away one line on giving us a description of what it is.  Like "Red Matter, a concentrated matrix of graviton particles suspended in an anti-matter matter containment field" or some such!

 

2)         Time.  Hey, this is the Star Trek universe and we need a plot device, so let's mess with the Space-Time continuum!  I get it.  They need some device to pull the Star Trek movie off canon and reboot the series.  I am okay with that, really.  But then leave it alone.  There was just too much old-Spock telling new-Spock what to do and how to do it.   I like Nemoy's Spock.  I like that he was part of the movie and bridged the two.  I think they relied on that too much.

 

3)         And the worst.  Captain Cadet!  Yes folks, we are going to take someone who has not even graduated from the appropriate learning institution and make him the leader of 1000 people!  I am okay with a Lord of the Flies like "young people stepping up and taking command" atmosphere.  I am even okay with the "oops, how did we get here" motif (a la Space Camp!); but it is simply too unbelievable to take a military structure and stretch it to allow for a cadet to jump 6 or 8 promotions to Captain in one day.  When I saw that Spock had the rank of Commander while everyone else was still a cadet, I knew we were in trouble. 

             Compare Kirk's elevation to Uhura's.  Uhura's made sense.  A commissioned officer couldn't do what Uhura could, so she was asked to step up and do the task she was trained to do.  But, she started her Enterprise voyage down in the communication pool like any other low-ranking person.  

             Sure, from a military perspective, Star Trek is full of cases when Kirk or Picard or someone is not 'following orders.' And sometimes they get away with it, and sometimes they do not.  If this were 1600 and not 2300, and you could buy a command, I would be okay with a young Kirk stepping onto the bridge of the Enterprise.  Even if it were his natural charisma and leadership that made everyone look to him in crisis, that might have helped (a little), but Pike turning and saying to Kirk "You are the new first officer" was too much to handle.  The elevation of new-Kirk to Captain just blows any and all credibility out of the water and took me out of the movie.

 

So, I guess I am just like all the other Trek nerds and would rather complain than enjoy.  I can't quote the inconsistencies between In a Mirror, Darkly; Mirror, Mirror and Crossover.  I can't tell you the first ship that old-Kirk served aboard (without looking it up on Wikipedia at least), but I have watched a lot of, and enjoyed most of, the Star Trek universe.  This movie just left me going "Meh."

Friday, March 06, 2009

Who watches the Watchmen

I have a confession to make. Despite my many layers of geekiness, I never got into comic books or their cousin, the graphic novel. For the written word, I have always been more of an epic fantasy consumer or an RPG-supplement-that-I-will-never-use reader.   Thus when I went to see The Watchmen at the local megaplex tonight, I did not have a preconception of what the movie ought to be.  I have seen comic book adaptations that I loved (i.e. X-men and Spiderman) and ones that I did not (The Hulk (2003) and do not even get me started on Fantastic 4).  Ultimately I want works based on speculative fiction to do well so that more spec. fic. works will be produced, but I readily acknowledge the difficult task for Hollywood types to produce projects that appeal to the zealot fans that science fiction produces and that also appeals to a wide enough audience to make the projects profitable.


***Spoiler Warning*** Some details below.

So, as a fan of geeky in general without being a fanboy of the Watchmen universe, I can say that I enjoyed Watchmen very much.  It was dark, depressing, pessimistic, gritty, and gratuitous.  And those are the good parts!  Again, without knowing the source material, I found some parts distracting.  The crystal clockwork on  the planet Mars was visually stunning and completely superfluous.  I get it, Dr. Manhattan is not like the rest of us.  Celestial Harmony and all that, but it felt like some extra cash was left in the special effects budget and it had to be spent.  And what's with the horned tiger beast that suddenly starts following Ozymandias around towards the end of the movie? Where did she come from?  

What drew me into the movie and the Watchmen universe, however, was the alternative history that is created as the background to justify the pending nuclear holocaust that is the dramatic force behind the plot of the movie.  The film uses flashbacks and narration to weave the main story (set in 1985) with a host of background information about both the characters and the world in which they live - from the characters' predecessors in the '40s to radical political issues in the '60s and '70s (such as the answer as to who shot JFK, how America won in Vietnam, and a world in which Nixon retains the presidency into the '80s).  This distopian alternative history allowed the screenwriters to plant (or steal) a number of subtle humorous lines into a very dark and violent story.  When the final confrontation between the heroes and the villain occurs, the viewer understands where the parties are coming from and how they reached the decisions that lead to the final confrontation.

In the end, the movie made me want to reach out to the source material.  Unfortunately, at 2 hours and 43 minutes, the movie let out after the local book stores were closed so I will have to wait to see if I enjoy the graphic novel as much as the movie.  The book is always better, right?

Watchmen (the movie)?  3.5 M's out of 5.  

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Ship of Magic



With news that one of my favorite authors, Robin Hobb, is preparing to return to the Realm of the Elderlings in an upcoming novel (or two)[1], I decided to pull Ship of Magic
off the shelf for a reread.  Ship of Magic is the first volume of The Liveship Traders trilogy and takes place a few years after the Farseer Trilogy.[2]  It has been a number of years since I read Ship of Magic and am always cautious when it comes time to reread a book after a long interval.  Will I still find the story engaging?  Will the characters' development seem natural in light of the information I know from later in the story?  Will books that I loved as a kid or young adult still live up to my presumably more mature scrutiny?

 

In the case of Ship of Magic, the answers are all a resounding yes.  The Liveship Traders tackle compelling  issues of gender equality, imperialism, and slavery in the context of the struggles of individuals trying to leave their personal marks in the world, or at least survive it.  The story opens with introductions of a wide cast of characters (a pirate with big ambitions, a young woman with the need to prove herself, and her mother trying to cope with the loss of her husband – to name but a few) and is a wide departure from the first-person narrative of the Farseer Trilogy. The narrative immediate flavors the story with a sense of foreboding, a pregnant pause of anticipation for the drama that is about to be inflicted on the cast.  Financial problems face the family of the main characters, political disagreements strain relations with the imperial capital, and strange, non-human creatures dot the landscape with their incomprehensible motivations.  While telling the particular stories of the varied protagonists, the author fills in pieces of the history of the Realm of the Elderlings and lays the foundations for stories 4 and 5 books away.

The soft hand with which Robin Hobb builds the history and rules of her universe is especially prevalent in the Ship of Magic.  This story introduces us to concepts not present in the Farseer Trilogy, but which fit that effort’s world building in a complimentary manner in a seamless transition from the cold and barbaric north lands to the more “civilized” and temperate south.  Because of this subtle approach, new readers are not left wondering what was missed by picking up this book first while devoted fans can catch subtle foreshadowing or explanations of past events.  By re-reading this volume, the skill of this construction is even more pronounced.  Pick it up today and you won’t be disappointed.

It may be hard for me to wait six months to a year for the next novel. Luckily, Robin Hobb has a short story set in the Realm of the Elderlings in the recently released A Fantasy Medley and there is always the “Homecoming” in the anthology Legends II.

Ship of Magic? 4 M’s out of 5
Re-reading Ship of Magic?  4.5 M’s out of 5

 


[1] Dragon Keeper is scheduled to be released  in the United Kingdom in the summer of 2009 and in the United States in the winter of 2010.  Robin Hobb reports that the manuscript came in at double the expected length and that the book may be released as two volumes. 

[2] The Liveship Traders trilogy was itself followed by The Tawny Man trilogy to complete a trilogy of trilogies set in the Realm of the Elderlings.  In contrast, The Soldier Son trilogy, discussed earlier on this blog, is not set in the Realm of the Elderlings.



Share/Save/Bookmark